December 3, 2024
Asset & Debt Recovery Legal Executive
We are looking for an experienced Legal Executive to join our Asset & Debt Recovery Team, based in Dublin 2. This is a role where you will be part of...
A recent High Court decision has reaffirmed the principle that expert witnesses should only give opinion evidence strictly in the area(s) of their expertise.
Expert Witness Criticism
The court was particularly critical of one expert witness in the recent case of B v Minister for Education & Ors [2024] IEHC 313.
Mr. Justice Simons stated that the extent of her evidence “went far beyond that permitted by the rules in relation to expert evidence”. The independence of that expert witness was thus undermined and the court could attach little weight to her evidence.
Expert Evidence Principles
The court usefully re-stated the following principles relating to expert evidence as set down by the Court of Appeal in Duffy v McGee [2022] IECA 254:
In the case of Duffy v McGee, Mr. Justice Noonan observed that: “objectivity, by definition, requires that one has regard to both sides of the case. A central component of the duty of the expert is to ascertain all relevant facts, whether they support the client’s case or not”.
Conclusion
Parties instructing expert witnesses in litigation must be clear as to their role and duties to ensure that the evidence given is limited strictly to their area(s) of expertise.
It is clear from recent decisions of the superior courts that the expression of opinion outside an expert witness’ area(s) of expertise may be fatal as the court may be justified in attaching little weight to their evidence.
Further Information
For further advice on Commercial Litigation matters, please contact Ciarán Leavy, Partner and Head of the Commercial Litigation & Dispute Resolution Team.
Search site
Contact our office
Make an enquiry